WASHINGTON, DC, November 10, 1994 -- The Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA) filed comments today in response to the USTR Notice of investigation concerning Japanese government regulations affecting aftermarket auto parts sales (the so-called "Section 301 Case").

In particular, JAMA objected to a statement from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative that auto parts sales in Japan are limited by market restrictions.

"These statements by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative are incorrect and contradict earlier statements from the Department of Commerce and USTR that, given the progress of U.S. auto parts purchases by Japanese auto manufacturers, there is no basis for initiating a 301 case with respect to auto parts," William C. Duncan, General Director, JAMA Washington said today.

In addition, JAMA stated that the unilateral process and retaliation involved in Section 301 violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the recently completed Uruguay Round agreement. Essentially, U.S. Government action in this case is directed at forcing Japan, under threat of retaliation, to de-regulate its auto parts aftermarket. This action is inconsistent with the GATT.

For more information, contact Charley Powers, (202) 452-1670--JAMA News Bureau.